recombinant hgfl (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Recombinant Hgfl, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+human+hgfl/pmc09140067-70-0-5?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 92 stars, based on 5 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "RON ( MST1R ) and HGFL ( MST1 ) Co-Overexpression Supports Breast Tumorigenesis through Autocrine and Paracrine Cellular Crosstalk"
Article Title: RON ( MST1R ) and HGFL ( MST1 ) Co-Overexpression Supports Breast Tumorigenesis through Autocrine and Paracrine Cellular Crosstalk
Journal: Cancers
doi: 10.3390/cancers14102493
Figure Legend Snippet: RON and HGFL overexpression co-occur in the murine MMTV-PyMT model of breast cancer and global HGFL deletion impairs tumor growth and metastasis and improves immune cell recruitment. ( A ) Representative western blot for RON and HGFL on lysates from normal mammary glands or PyMT tumor-bearing mammary glands of FVB mice (n = 2). ( B ) Immunohistochemistry staining for RON or HGFL on PyMT tumor-bearing mammary glands or mammary glands of non-transgenic (normal) FVB mice at specified ages (n = 4). ( C ) Tumor growth kinetics of HGFL proficient (+/+; n = 12) or HGFL deficient (−/−; n = 10) PyMT mice and ( D ) respective metastatic incidence and number of metastases in the lungs taken at 90 days of age. ( E ) Representative images and quantitation of specified staining for BrdU and TUNEL, ( F ) F4/80, iNOS, and Arginase-1, and ( G ) CD8a and CD4 in the mammary glands of PyMT (HGFL +/+ or HGFL −/− ) mice at 90 days. Comparisons of histological samples between groups were analyzed using Student’s t -tests. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Over Expression, Western Blot, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Transgenic Assay, Quantitation Assay, TUNEL Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Conditional RON deletion in the myeloid compartment phenocopies global HGFL loss in a RON-driven mammary tumorigenesis model. Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank statistics of mice for ( A ) time to onset of mammary ductal hyperplasia (MMTV-RON, n = 9; ΔMyeloid, n = 8) and ( B ) time to tumor palpability of MMTV-RON+ mice with or without conditional deletion of RON in the myeloid compartment (ΔMyeloid; MMTV-RON, n = 16; ΔMyeloid, n = 10). ( C ) Tumor growth kinetics of MMTV-RON+ or MMTV-RON ΔMyeloid mice (MMTV-RON, n = 9; ΔMyeloid, n = 9) and ( D ) respective gross metastatic incidence at 90 days of age. ( E ) Micro-metastatic area measured on H&E stained sections from mice of both genotypes taken from mammary tumors with comparable tumor volume (MMTV-RON, n = 6; ΔMyeloid, n = 5). ( F ) Quantitated histological analysis of MMTV-RON and ΔMyeloid mammary tumor sections stained with Ki67, CC3, ( G ) F4/80, iNOS, Arginase-1, ( H ) CD8a, or CD4. Comparisons of histological samples between groups were analyzed using Student’s t -tests. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Loss of tumor cell-produced HGFL or systemic (physiologic) HGFL alters mammary tumorigenesis and immune cell recruitment. ( A ) Western blot analysis of lysates from R7 shNT and R7 shHGFL cells for HGFL and Actin (loading control). ( B ) Mammary tumor growth kinetics of R7 shNT and R7 shHGFL cells following orthotopic implantation into syngeneic HGFL deficient (FVB HGFL −/− ) or HGFL proficient FVB (FVB WT; HGFL +/+ ) mice (n = 5 mice/group) and results were compared with a repeated-measures two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. ( C ) Tumor characterization through histological analyses for Ki67, CC3, ( D ) F4/80, iNOS, Arginase-1, and ( E ) CD8a and CD4. ( F ) Tumor growth kinetics of mammary tumors generated from R7 cells in either WT or HGFL −/− mice with or without liposomal clodronate treatment to deplete macrophages (n = 6 mice/group). Groups were compared using a two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Produced, Western Blot, Control, Generated
Figure Legend Snippet: Loss of HGFL in breast cancer cells impairs mammosphere formation, macrophage migration, and alters the secretome of both cell types. ( A ) Macrophage migration towards denoted stimulus including serum-free media (SFM), SFM + recombinant HGFL (rHGFL, 50ng/mL), conditioned media (CM) from R7 control or R7shHGFL cells, or cultured R7 control or R7shHGFL cells. Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. ( B ) Macrophage migration as in ( A ) toward R7 cells pretreated with vehicle, an Akt inhibitor (AKTi), a MAPK inhibitor (MAPKi), a Stat3 inhibitor (STAT3i), or an NFkB inhibitor (NFKBi). Following inhibitor treatment for 6 h, R7 cells were washed, placed in SFM, and used as a chemoattractant. ( C ) Mammosphere formation of R7 cells with and without HGFL knockdown (shHGFL), monoculture or co-culture with RON TK +/+ BMDM, RON TK −/− BMDM, and with and without supplementation with 50 ng/mL recombinant HGFL (rHGFL). Groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. ( D , E ) Heatmaps of secreted proteins detected by Mouse XL Cytokine Arrays incubated with conditioned media from ( D ) R7 cells and R7 sgRON cells (R7 cells with RON loss via CRISPR-Cas9 technology, R7 KD cells from ) or ( E ) with conditioned media from WT (RON TK +/+ ) or RON deficient TK −/− BMDM. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Migration, Recombinant, Control, Cell Culture, Knockdown, Co-Culture Assay, Incubation, CRISPR
Figure Legend Snippet: Pharmacological inhibition of HGFL-RON signaling via BMS777607 treatment abrogates PyMT-driven tumorigenesis and metastasis. ( A ) Tumor growth kinetics of mammary tumors in PyMT+ mice treated with 50 mg/kg/day BMS777607 versus vehicle control (Vehicle: n = 6; BMS777607: n = 7). Data was analyzed with a two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. ( B ) Metastatic incidence in PyMT+ mice from ( A ) with BMS777607 treatment versus vehicle control. Data was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. ( C ) Histological analysis of BMS777607 treated and vehicle-treated PyMT tumor sections stained with Ki67, CC3, ( D ) F4/80, iNOS, Arginase 1, ( E ) CD8a, or CD4. ( F ) Working model of our experimental findings summarized (generated using BioRender). *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Control, Staining, Generated
Figure Legend Snippet: RON ( MST1R ) and HGFL ( MST1 ) expression are correlated in virtually all tumor types and expression is not associated with recurrent breast cancer driver mutations. ( A ) MST1R and MST1 gene expression are coordinately upregulated across specified cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) evaluated with Spearman’s correlation. ( B ) MST1R and MST1 RNA expression from TCGA showing coordinate expression in heatmap form. Volcano plots of ( C ) MST1R and ( D ) MST1 RNA expression stratified between Altered and Unaltered samples of listed recurrent breast cancer driver mutations from TCGA Pan-Cancer and METABRIC datasets were evaluated using Multiple t -tests on log-transformed expression values. Significant correlations of specified immune cell infiltration signatures with ( E ) MST1R and ( F ) MST1 gene expression using the tumor immune microenvironment estimation resource (TIMER) in breast cancer data from TCGA.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression, RNA Expression, Transformation Assay
